Book of the Year,  Chronicles,  Contemporary Literature,  Latin America,  Short Stories,  The Plot,  Thriller,  What I Read

Satan

What does it take for a human being to cross the invisible line separating sanity from massacre? Mario Mendoza doesn’t offer easy answers: he drags you through Bogotá’s broken streets until you understand that evil doesn’t have horns or trident, but an everyday face and terminal loneliness.

Four stories converge in the colonial heart of La Candelaria: a beautiful woman who robs executives in luxury bars, a painter inhabited by forces beyond his control that paint horrors on his canvases, a priest facing a case of demonic possession while doubting his own faith, and Campo Elías Delgado, Vietnam veteran obsessed with the duality between Jekyll and Hyde, who begins his unstoppable descent toward absolute darkness. Mendoza won the 2002 Premio Biblioteca Breve with this novel that functions as a merciless X-ray of contemporary Colombia: a country where violence is so everyday that the supernatural seems merely a minor addition to the horror of each day.

Mendoza’s narrative springs directly from Bogotá’s sidewalks. His language is raw, without concessions, with vocabulary that smells of gasoline and nocturnal fear. There are no filters or euphemisms: violence is shown explicit, visceral, disturbing. The brilliant part is how each character carries dark stories that reveal themselves layer by layer, progressively darkening until the reader understands they’re trapped in a spiral with no exit. The fact that the novel is inspired by the real Pozzeto massacre—where Campo Elías Delgado murdered several people in a Bogotá restaurant in 1986, and that Mendoza personally knew the perpetrator—adds a disturbing dimension that contaminates even the fiction passages: everything could be true, everything could be happening right now a few blocks away.

Satan is required reading for those seeking psychological thriller without concessions, but also for older adolescents accompanied by adults capable of opening deep conversations about evil, marginality and the limits of human empathy. Mendoza doesn’t judge his characters: he exhibits them as specimens of a failed social experiment called modern city. Upon closing the book, Bogotá’s streets will never look innocent again, and that permanent discomfort is the greatest victory of an author who writes as if each sentence were a dagger stuck in the conscience of the reader who prefers to look the other way.